MINUTES
REGULAR
MEETING
WEDNESDAY,
FEBRUARY 14, 2007
ROBERT
LIVERMORE COMMUNITY CENTER
4444 EAST
AVENUE, LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA
7:00 P.M.
CRESTA
BLANCA BALLROOM
DIRECTORS PRESENT: Director
Faltings, Director Furst, Director Goodman, Director Kamena and President
Turner (5)
DIRECTORS
ABSENT: None
(0)
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Chiye
Azuma, Tim Barry, Jim Brandenburg,
Jim Carlson, Lora Cohen, Michael Kyle, Barbara Kraybill, Gretchen Sommers
Meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by
President Turner. Roll was taken and all Directors were present except Director
Kamena.
2. PUBLIC FORUM
President Turner asked for public comment. No
public comment was received. President Turner closed public comment.
3. CONSENT AGENDA:
3.1 BOARD MINUTES
3.1.1 Meeting of January 31, 2007.
3.2 COMMUNICATIONS:
3.2.1 Letter from Guadalupe Castillo
following up on request for bilingual services from LARPD.
3.3 General Manager’s Monthly Report (#60/7)
Director Faltings requested a correction to
minutes of the January 31, 2007 Board meeting: on page 6, the wording of the
motion for agenda item 13.3 should be amended to read, “On a motion by Director
Faltings, seconded by Director Goodman, approved the staff recommendation to
reject the claim on behalf of Joshua Wright and
forward the claim to the District’s insurance carrier, passing 5-0.”
Director Faltings made a motion, seconded by Director
Goodman., to approve the Consent Agenda. 4-0. President Turner requested that
the minutes of the January 31, 2007 Board meeting be corrected to reflect the
fact that the public comment and motions for Agenda Items 7.1 and 7.2 were in
the proper order. President Turner asked about the letter from Ms. Castillo and
whether there has been staff follow-up. General Manager Barry responded that he
was following up on it.
President Turner called the motion. The motion
to approve the Consent Agenda, with requested corrections, was approved 4-0;
Director Kamena was not present.
Director Kamena arrived at 7:05 pm.
4. CONSENT AGENDA: RESOLUTIONS: None.
5. BIDS AND PUBLIC HEARINGS: None.
6. OLD BUSINESS: None.
6.1 FRIENDSHIP
CENTER RELOCATION
President Turner stated that the Board will
receive a status report on the search for a new location for the Friendship
Center and consider funding sources and site selection for the project. General
Manager Barry summarized the staff report. The staff recommendation is that the
Board of Directors:
1. Select the Merritt C option as the site for the new Friendship Center, including $4.3 million as the project budget.
2. Direct staff to seek other local government funding partners to contribute to the construction costs of the project, and report the results back to the Board at the April 25, 2007 Board meeting or sooner.
3. The decision to move forward with this project is contingent upon securing additional financial assistance from other governmental or private sector sources by May, 2007.
Mr. Barry explained that the Friendship Center
lease for space at the Charter School, which expires in June 2007, has been
extended to June 2008, with the option to extend another year if needed. Mr. Barry
discussed in detail the other elements of the staff report, including:
feasibility and cost/benefit analysis for potential sites; financing the
project; funding partners; fundraising campaign; and operating budget of the
Friendship Center. Mr. Barry reiterated the staff recommendation. Mr. Barry
stated that there are several people here who can answer any questions that
Directors might have, including. City staff and Tri-Valley Adult Day Care
Program (TVADCP) board members, and LARPD staff.
President Turner reiterated the three choices
recommended by the General Manager. He
recommended that the District choose a project and at least pursue it through
May 2007, to investigate whether funding is out there. He acknowledged that it
is a large sum of money for a relatively small number of clients, but it is a
wonderful program, which is needed by the community. He stated that the Board
must make a business decision, not an emotional decision, and that the Board
has a fiduciary responsibility to the District. He expressed appreciation to
the School District and the Charter School for allowing the Friendship Center
to extend its lease. President Turner asked the Directors if they were
comfortable with the Merritt C option recommended by staff.
Directors asked for, and received, clarification
on the following items: square footage of the current Friendship Center space; the
meaning of the term “client capacity;” meaning of license capacity; whether the
District could afford on its own the $1.7 million facility;
Revenue and expenses of the program; the option
of renting a commercial property; the importance of outside space for the
program; whether licensing requires; the annual debt service estimates; capital
costs versus maintenance costs; whether program costs and revenue would change
with a new facility; the subsidy per client; specifics about what costs and
items are included in the timeline for the Merritt C option; projected
operational costs for Merritt C option; the apparent decreasing number of
clients; the staff recommendation that, if additional partners cannot be found,
the program be discontinued; the need
to reconsider initial support if financial support does not materialize. Directors
expressed appreciation for all of the efforts put forth by staff on this
project.
President Turner opened public comment.
1)
Marie
Abbott, Trevarno Road, Livermore, said that she hopes the Board will choose Merritt
C option.
2)
Dennis
Gambs, member of the TVADCP Board, said he wished to recognize all of the
effort put out by staff and city staff. He said he feels there are two good
options, feels the cost difference between the two would not be that
significant (Merritt and Civic Center). He said there are construction delays
that could occur on Trevarno Road, as well as neighbor approval. He said he feels
the Civic Center site would provide a nice partnership with the City, and thinks
the program would receive more support in that location. Another advantage of
the Civic Center site, he said, is that it leaves the Merritt building
available for other uses the District might have. He stated that he will
support either option and work hard for the program
3)
Wilson
Cooper, Trevarno Road, Livermore, thanked staff for sharing the plans with the Trevarno
Homeowners’ Association (HOA). He said that the HOA welcomes this as a use for
the facility. He said the Merritt Building offers the most challenges; have to
meet the program needs ands meet the requirements of building in an historic
area. He feels it is important to maintain the integrity of the historic
district which is Trevarno Road. He referred to a letter that he sent to the District.
He suggested that we bring someone on board with the architects who has
experience with historic preservation.
President Turner closed public comment.
Director Faltings made a motion, seconded by Director
Furst, to relocate the Friendship Center to a remodeled Merritt building on Trevarno
Road, and that the building, whether it be designed by this architect or
another architect, cost no more than $1.7 million.
Director Faltings said that her aim is to keep the
program going, and that it is better to serve even a few people, rather than no
one. She said all the designs and conceptual work, etc. comes down to money. She
had questions about the different options. Discussion ensued regarding square
footage, client capacity and costs. Director Faltings said that she would like
to see a more plain plan that the District can better afford.
Director Goodman asked Ms. Faltings whether she
was saying that the District should do this project without a partner. Director
Faltings responded that, yes, that is what she is saying. Director Goodman stated
that he wants the program to get more, but not at a huge cost. He suggests that
the District commit that, but get others to help with the costs. He said that
he wants to support having the Friendship Center in some way. He said that he
would support Director Faltings’ concept it if it was the only way that the
District could do it. He said he hopes the District can look at other options,
with the understanding that LARPD try to limit the amount of money it spends.
Director Furst asked about the Merritt A option
and if this the minimum bare-bones cost to renovate the current building? He
said that is his understanding. He said that bare bones costs $2.7 million,
with minimal upgrades, to get a license; so, it is not practical to go less
than 2.7 million? The General Manager confirmed this.
Director Kamena thanked the Trevarno Road
neighbors for coming to the meeting, and for saying that they like the idea of
the program moving to their street. He said that the District will consult with
the neighbors, no matter what it does. He said that the Friendship Center has
been a wonderful program and we’ve had a unique set of circumstances. He said
he appreciates the generosity of the school district in letting LARPD use the
property. Director Kamena said that he thinks the District needs to come to
terms with the fact that something has got to give. He said that the District cannot
put on this program, that it cannot afford to. He said that LARPD could make a
very long list of all the wonderful things it could do with this money. He said
he sees the options as modifying the program to fit the District’s budget or
eliminating the program. He stated that he do He said that the program provides
a good, safe place for seniors to go, and he does not think they need to go outdoors
to do that. He said that most clients are not in the program 5 days a week. He
said that the outside component seems to be the biggest component of the cost. He
said the District could rent indoor space for considerably less than the costs
being presented tonight. He stated that he cannot support the motion, nor any
of the options offered by staff. He stated that this is no fault of the staff,
who did what they were asked to do.
President Turner said that he appreciates the
job done by staff. He stated that the Merritt C option would serve 48 people,
all with important needs, but the cost would be about 20% of what it cost to
build the Robert Livermore Community Center. He said that he agrees with Director
Kamena, that he cannot support any of the projects in the report because the
district does not have the money. He said that it is not fair to sacrifice
other projects for this project. He stated that he agrees with Director Kamena
that leasing indoor commercial space would be more doable, and that he cannot
support this project as it is presented to the Board.
President Turner called the motion. The motion
to relocate the Friendship Center to a remodeled Merritt building on Trevarno
Road, and that the building, whether it be designed by this architect or
another architect, cost no more than $1.7 million failed, with Directors Goodman and Faltings in favor, and Directors Furst and Kamena, and
President Turner, against.
Director Kamena made a motion, seconded by
President Turner, that the District prepare a cost estimate for creating a
licensable space on the order of 4,000 to 8,000 square feet, at a commercial
space that does not necessarily include an outside space.
Director Furst said that staff had developed
cost estimates of commercial space leasing, and asked if anyone present had
those cost estimates. Senior Recreation
Supervisor Jim Carlson responded that the estimates had been approximately $2
per square foot. President Turner said that that does not sound like a lot of
money. He said that a tenant might be able to increase the per foot payment and
have the landlord make the improvements.
Director Faltings asked if we are talking about
a long term lease, or a rental situation. Director Kamena responded, either one,
and that it looks like the District could cut its costs in half with commercial
space. He said it is still beyond what staff recommends coming from the general
fund.
Director Goodman said that what is being considered
is what the District does as a whole, in terms of program, etc. He said he would
support this motion only because it does not close the door on the program. He
stated that said the District doesn’t know enough yet abut the commercial
option. He said that perhaps it is the best way to go, perhaps not. He said
that it opens the door to look at other options. He said that he is disappointed
but that it may be the way we need to go.
Director Furst said that the staff report said that
all of the options would cost about $1 million to operate. He said that if the
District gets a commercial space, there are still renovation costs. He asked if
there is still $1 million in operating costs with commercial space. General Manager
Barry said he guessed that, yes, that would be the case for a 48- client
capacity space. He said that staff was conservative in its estimates. Director Furst
stated that he has concerns about
renovation costs and the estimated $1 million operating budget. He said that client
numbers have been decreasing. He noted that a million dollars is a lot, and
that he does not think that the District will meet those costs with client
fees.
President Turner asked about the additional
assistance from other agencies, and whether leasing commercial space would change
this. General Manager Barry replied that it may modify whether we get partners
for an endowment or operating costs. He said that capital funds are slightly
easier to come by than ongoing operating funds; commercial space would have
ongoing operating costs that are higher than with space the District owns.
Director Kamena said that the purpose of his
motion was to cut out a very large cost element. He said that he knows the
licensing requirements are very strict. He said that, if the licensing does not
required the outside element, the District can do the program cheaper with
leased commercial space.
President Turner called the motion. The motion that
the District prepare a cost estimate for creating a licensable space on the
order of 4,000 to 8,000 square feet, at a commercial space that does not
necessarily include an outside space,
passed 4-1, with Director Faltings dissenting.
President Turner said that there is a daunting
task ahead of the District, with decisions to be made in May.
General Manager Barry asked for clarification on
the motion: is it to bring back a report to the Board on commercial space for
4,000-8,000square feet? President Turner responded that, yes, this was the
motion.
6.2
FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR
FUNDRAISING
President Turner
explained that the Board will consider hiring the Tri-Valley Community Foundation
to provide a feasibility study on raising both capital and endowment funding
for the Friendship Center. General Manager Barry said that the Board is being asked
to approve spending $15,000 to hire the Tri-Valley Community Foundation to
conduct a study, which would take approximately three months to complete. Jean
Prasher of the City has worked out a cost share arrangement. The study would
also be paid for by the City of Livermore Housing Division ($10,000), the City
of Livermore CDBG Program ($10,000) and TVADCP Funding ($15,000); the total
cost of the study would be $50,000. Mr. Barry said that David Rice, President
of the Tri-Valley Community Foundation, is here to answer questions, as is Jean
Prasher of the City of Livermore Housing and Human Services department. Mr.
Barry explained that the study involves the consultant analyzing the potential
donors for a campaign and gives the District the feasibility and estimate of
success. Mr. Barry referred to Mr. Rice’s letter of proposal which has details
on the feasibility study.
President Turner asked if this is still an issue
given the previous motion. General Manager Barry responded that it will still
take capital investment if the District goes to a commercial space, and the
study also covers the area of endowment, which the program is in need of, to
balance the operating deficit.
Director Faltings noted that the feasibility
study will include construction, renovation, ongoing expenses, etc. She said
that she feels it is viable to continue with this item.
Director Furst asked whether the District would
need to pay the costs whether or not a site is found for the program. He asked
if the City and TVADCP funding was already assured, and if these agencies would
still contribute the $35,000 for the study. Mr. Barry said that staff would
need to go back to each group and see if they are still willing to contribute. Director
Goodman suggested that a motion could be made, contingent on that.
Jean Prasher of the City confirmed that the City
will continue to support the Friendship Center and will support the feasibility
study. She noted that the study could include a variety of options, asking
funders what they would prefer to contribute to. She said that the study can
bring back great deal of information to the Board. She said that if they come
back in May and weight out for the Board what they think the District can
expect in terms of funding. She said she hopes the Board will support this
study.
President Turner opened
public comment.
1)
Dennis
Gambs of the TVADCP said he would support the idea of the feasibility study,
but he does not know if we can get support for any sort of program if we do not
go ahead with this study. He said that maybe the study will help us keep our
options open.
Director Faltings made a motion, seconded by
Director Goodman, to allocate $15,000 from the District’s General Fund to
participate in a cost share with the City of Livermore and TVADCP to hire the Tri-Valley
Community Foundation to provide a feasibility study on raising both capital and
endowment funding for the Friendship Center.
President Turner asked Directors for comments.
No comments were received from Directors. President Turner called the motion.
The motion to allocate $15,000 from the District’s General Fund to participate
in a cost share with the City of Livermore and TVADCP to hire the Tri-Valley
Community Foundation to provide a feasibility study on raising both capital and
endowment funding for the Friendship Center passed 4-0 ; Director Kamena was
absent at the time of the vote.
7. NEW
BUSINESS:
7.1 REQUEST FROM SIR TO
INCREASE MAXIMUM ATTENDANCE AT SIR PICNICS AT RAVENSWOOD HISTORICAL SITE
President Turner stated that the Board will consider a
request from SIR Branch 101 to increase the maximum attendance at SIR picnics
at the Ravenswood Historical Site.
General Manager Barry referred to the staff report and said
that staff is recommending that we go forward with the suggestions in the
report. Director Furst asked if this is a one-time exemption, or is it just for
the SIR Group. General Manager Barry replied that staff is asking the Board to
amend the policy under the set of circumstances listed in the report, for all
renters, not just the SIR group. Discussion occurred regarding parking and the
parking lot.
President Turner opened public comment.
1)
John
Pitts of SIR said the group would like to get an increase in the maximum
attendance for a month a year. He represents three SIR groups. He said that the
$160 increase per event that is recommended by staff is a lot of money for many
of the SIR members. He said that the SIR groups do a lot of their own set-up
and clean-up and does not think additional staff would be required, so that the
$160 increase would not be justified. He said they do not need additional
parking.
President Turner closed public comment.
President Turner asked staff about the additional $160, and
if it was to cover staff costs. General Manager Barry replied that Assistant
Community Center Director Sheryl Hardin put together the report, so he was
unsure. Turner asked if the fee was based on a formula in the system or if it
was arbitrary. Mr. Barry said that he is sure there is a reason for the
increase and that LARPD has not raised the price in so long, that he is sure
the marketplace is higher now.
Director Furst noted that this amendment does
not affect just the SIR groups, and that other renters may not be as responsible
in terms of clean-up, etc. He stated that he supports the higher fee.
Director Faltings stated that she supports fee
structure proposed by staff. She noted that the 182 person maximum is not related
to the parking capacity, but rather to the restroom facility capacity. Director
Faltings requested the following wording changes in the bulleted area of the
staff report “Additional parking for 30 cars…………… remove the word “in and” the
winery; cars can park next to it, but not in it. The other change she requested
is that “excluding use of main house” be changed to “excluding use of all
buildings except the restrooms.”
Director Faltings made a motion, seconded by Director Furst, to
approve the staff recommendation to amend the rental policy to accommodate a
maximum of 182 persons, excluding use of all buildings except restrooms, and that
the overflow parking not include vehicles being parked within the walls of the
winery ruins, at the fee structure recommended by staff.
Director Goodman expressed concern that, when
accepting rental applications, staff be very clear about the good weather
requirements and the condition of the grounds regarding parking. For example, the weather may be clear, but
the ground too wet to park on. General Manager Barry suggested that the parking
restrictions refer to the condition of the ground, not the weather conditions.
Director Kamena asked if this is consistent with
what the SIR members are looking for. Mr. Pitts replied that he does not think
they can afford this; it is almost a 50% increase. He said they are not costing
LARPD any more money by having additional more people.
Director Kamena made an amending motion, that
the rate be the same for both numbers of people. The motion died for lack of a second.
President Turner said that discussion is now returned
to the main motion. He said that he does not agree with Mr. Pitts that it does
not cost LARPD more money for more people. He said that the District has to
cover its costs, and this is what staff is recommending.
President Turner called the motion. The motion
to approve the staff recommendation to amend the rental policy to accommodate a
maximum of 182 persons, excluding use of all buildings except restrooms, and
that the overflow parking not include vehicles being parked within the walls of
the winery ruins, at the fee structure recommended by staff passed 5-0.
7.2 ROBERTSON PARK
RESPITE AREA & TRAIL
President Turner explained that the Board will consider
approval of a concept design for a respite area and trail in Robertson Park.
General Manager Barry gave background information on the
project. He said that the Arroyo Crossing development is moving the playground from
the horseshoe pit area to the proximity of the soccer fields. City staff felt that
a respite area near the horseshoe pits, with a trail from this area to the
playground, would be a good addition to the project. The estimated cost of a
paved trail is $214,000. This money will come out of AB1600 fees from the Arroyo
Crossing development. LARPD will pay for this project out of the in lieu fees.
Sherri Tafel of Beals Alliance gave a slide
show, giving details about the project.
President Turner said that the General Manager’s
recommendation is to approve the design of the trail and respite area. He asked
if Directors had any questions. Director Goodman asked why the teeter totter
was chosen. Ms. Tafel replied that the committee had requested it.
Director Faltings asked if the teeter totter
meets with public safety requirements. Ms. Tafel responded that it does.
President Turner opened public comment. No public
comment was received.
Director Kamena made a motion, seconded by Director
Faltings, to approve the concept design for a respite area and trail in
Robertson Park.
President Turner asked for comments from
Directors.
Director Kamena asked if this still needs to go
to the City for approval. LARPD Landscape Architect Chiye Azuma responded that the
design has gone through City review, that LARPD and City staff worked closely
together on the location and setting and the trail configuration. She said that
City review has been done.
President Turner called the motion. The motion
to approve the concept design for a respite area and trail in Robertson Park
passed 5-0.
7.3 RECLASSIFICATION
OF AN EMPLOYEE
President Turner said that the Board will consider the
General Manager’s recommendation to reclassify the Administrative Aide in Human
Resources to the position of Administrative Assistant.
General Manager Barry summarized the staff report. He stated
that in 2004 the District experienced staff lay-offs, one of the positions
being the Assistant to the General Manager. When this person left, a large
percentage of her duties were reassigned to the current Administrative Aide.
Mr. Barry said that the Administrative Aide has been doing a great job, that
the reassignment of duties was appropriate, and that it is economical for the
District to reclassify the Administrative Aide. There were no questions from
the Directors.
President Turner opened public comment. No
public comment was received.
President Turner asked for comments from the
Directors. No comments were received.
On a motion by Director Furst, seconded by Director
Goodman, approved reclassification of the Administrative Aide in Human Resources
to the position of Administrative Assistant, passing 5-0.
7.4 APPOINTMENT TO
THE PERSONNEL COMMISSION
President Turner stated that the Board will consider a
recommendation to appoint Margaret Carroll to another term on the Personnel
Commission.
No questions were asked by Directors.
President Turner opened public comment. No public comment was
received.
President Turner asked for Director comments. No comments
were received.
On a motion by Director Kamena, seconded by Director
Fust, approved Resolution No. 2043, a resolution appointing Margaret Carroll to
another term on the Personnel Commission, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Director Kamena, Director Goodman,
Director Faltings, Director Furst and President Turner (5)
NOES: None
(0)
ABSTENTIONS: None
(0)
ABSENT: None
(0)
President Turner thanked
Ms. Carroll for her service to the District.
7.5
BUDGET ALLOCATION FOR GOVERNMENT
RELATIONS CONSULTING SERVICES
President Turner stated that the Board will
consider approving a budget allocation of $36,000 for government relations
consulting services with Johan Klehs & Company and Aprea and Company in an
effort to increase the amount of property taxes LARPD gets from the state each
year.
General Manager Barry stated that he has been interested
in finding ways to get additional property taxes for LARPD. He has spoken with Eric
Willyerd, General Manager of Hayward Area Recreation and Park District (HARD). HARD
has hired Marc Aprea, a lobbyist, to assist in increasing property tax revenue
to that agency. Mr. Barry said that they have made headway, but not an ultimate
gain. Mr. Barry said that he sees it as advantageous to combine resources and
hire Johan Klehs as a consultant and Marc Aprea as a lobbyist to provide consulting
and lobbying services on the District’s behalf for 6 months. These consultants
will devise a strategy for the District, and will meet with legislators in an
effort to influence legislation.
Johan Klehs spoke to the Board. He said that he
is sensitive to the question as to whether there is a value to doing this. He
said it is our objective is to cap the ERAF losses to no more than 25% for
LARPD and other districts. He stated that Livermore has suffered a greater
percentage loss than any other district in the ERAF losses. He said that the
objective is 6 months, which coincides with the budget process of the State. He
said their intention is not to pass a bill, but to change the language of the
law, asking for the identical relief that East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD)
got back in 1990. Mr. Klehs said that there are about 33 other districts that have
lost over 25% of their property taxes. He said that his and Mr. Aprea’s efforts
will not harm the districts which have not lost over 25 %. He said that they have
met with other districts which support this strategy. Mr. Klehs gave details on
strategy and statistics. He said that they will ask the Directors to meet with
legislators. He said he will talk with the Board, and be very committed to this
project.
President Turner said that it makes sense to do
this because Mr. Klehs must be successful and he has been a legislator. He
asked if there were any questions from Directors.
Director Furst noted that the original proposal
was for a year, and asked why the contract being proposed now is for 6 months. General
Manager Barry replied that now is an opportune time to meet with legislators
and their staff and communicate with them as they are working on budget. He
added that not much happens in the summer. He said that the legislators take a
break after July, at which time the District can evaluate its success and the
momentum it has reached. He said the District might consider extending the
contract if it sees the value in it.
Mr. Klehs stated that EBRPD will not oppose this
effort on behalf of LARPD and other Districts, and will instruct their
legislative staff to support this.
President Turner opened public comment. No
public comment was received.
Director Furst made a motion, seconded by Director
Goodman, to approve a budget allocation of $36,000 for government relations
consulting services with Johan Klehs & Company and Aprea and Company in an
effort to increase the amount of property taxes LARPD gets from the state each
year.
President Turner asked for Director Comments.
Director Faltings stated that she originally
opposed the idea and had a change of heart after talking to Henry Agonia of
California Association of Recreation and Park Districts (CARPD). She realized
this effort on the District’s behalf would not hurt the districts that are
paying less.
President Turner called the motion.
Resolution No. 2044, a resolution approving a
budget allocation of $36,000 for government relations consulting services with
Johan Klehs & Company and Aprea and Company in an effort to increase the
amount of property taxes LARPD gets from the state each year, was approved by
the following roll call vote:.
AYES: Director Goodman,
Director Faltings, Director Furst, Director Kamena and President Turner.
NOES: None (0)
ABSTENTIONS: None
(0)
ABSENT: None (0)
8. COMMITTEE REPORTS
Director
Goodman reported on the meeting of the d Livermore Cultural Arts Council (LCAC).
Director
Furst reported on the agenda items of the recent Program Committee meeting.
Director Faltings distributed
the minutes of a recent Scottish Games Committee meeting to the Board.
9. MATTERS INITIATED/ANNOUNCEMENTS BY THE
DIRECTORS
1) Director Goodman asked whether the Robertson
Park Equestrian Show Arena cover project is on track. General Manager Barry
replied that, yes, LARPD is waiting for the permit from the City. He said he
believes that the project will be completed prior to the Spring Stampede event
in April.
2) Director Furst inquired about a temporary
easement with the Tri-Valley Conservancy for Sycamore Grove Park. He said that
he hopes that the District will finalize this soon, and he asked staff to move
it to the highest priority possible.
3) Director Furst asked about dedicating part of
a trail to the memory of Annie Quinn, as had been requested by President Turner
some time ago. He said that the Naming Committee, a joint effort between LARPD
and the City, does not seem to have gone anywhere. He said that he would like
to find out the status of the procedure for dedicating a section of trail so that
the District can dedicate a section to Annie Quinn.
4) President Turner announced that LCAC is
hosting the Sommerfest event on June 16, 2007.
None.
Meeting recessed at 9:28 p.m.
Meeting adjourned to Executive Session at 9:37
p.m.
11. EXECUTIVE SESSION
11.1 REAL ESTATE NEGOTIATIONS
Pursuant to Section 54956.8 of the Government
Code
Property:
Sycamore Grove Park, 1051 Wetmore Road, Livermore, CA
Agency Negotiator: District Staff and/or Legal
Counsel
Negotiating Parties: Chevron Pipe Line Company
Under Negotiation: Easement agreement
12. RECONVENE
TO OPEN SESSION
Meeting
reconvened to Open Session at 9:40 p.m.
13. REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN EXECUTIVE
SESSION
No action to report.
14. ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 9:41 p.m.
APPROVED,
_______________________________
Dale
Turner
President, Board of
Directors
ATTEST:
__________________________
General
Manager and ex-officio
Clerk
to the Board of Director